← Back to timeline
Expedia Group

Payments Hub + Automatic Payments

Leading a strategic overhaul of partner payments so getting paid felt simpler, clearer, and less operationally painful.

Expedia’s partner base had expanded from large hotel chains to smaller properties and vacation rentals run by lean teams. But the finance experience still reflected internal systems more than partner workflows. Getting paid, understanding charges, and reconciling bookings required too much effort.

My role as lead UX designer was to help turn a complicated finance surface into a clearer partner experience: understand the pain, align stakeholders, create a north-star direction, and then bring the work back into an achievable MVP.

Product question: How do we help partners spend less time trying to get paid and more time running their business?

What made it hard

Complexity

Navigation had grown around internal structures, redundant actions, finance terminology, and technical constraints.

Confidence

Partners needed simpler explanations of charges, payouts, invoices, and what action they were expected to take.

Operations

Lack of in-context help and unclear workflows contributed to avoidable support and finance contact volume.

Expedia payments hub northstar modules
North-star direction for a new billing and accounting hub: net balance, automatic payments, reconciliations, payment trends, and clearer task modules.

The questions that moved us from strategy to MVP

What can we simplify first?
Where do partners get stuck?
What needs better language?
What can we deliver fast?
What reduces contact volume?
What builds payment trust?

From design swarm to delivery sprint

We used a two-part process: a design swarm to explore the north-star without over-indexing on current constraints, then a focused design sprint to define scope, prototype quickly, and collect feedback.

That helped the team move from broad finance pain points into a practical delivery path: simplified terminology, recent invoices and payouts, quick tasks, help content, context based on payment method, and personalization for newly onboarded partners.

Expedia payments MVP modules
The MVP centered on simplified navigation, revenue metrics, recent invoices and payouts, quick tasks, settings previews, help, and opportunities.
Expedia automatic payments prototype walkthrough
Automatic Payments focused on a known partner pain point: reducing manual invoice work for smaller properties.
01 Mapped the system

Used interviews, system mapping, and competitive teardown to understand the real workflow.

02 Created the north star

Helped partners and stakeholders see what a simpler finance hub could become.

03 Scoped the MVP

Translated ambition into modules that could be launched and measured.

04 Validated with partners

Tested the automatic payments flow with small and medium properties before launch.

The leadership lesson was that trust in a payment experience is built through clarity: plain language, visible status, fewer manual steps, and enough context to know what happens next.

Impact

The work reframed partner payments from a fragmented finance task into a clearer management experience.

30% early signup

Automatic Payments launched in May 2020; the original portfolio deck noted 30% signup among partners with fewer than 20 rooms within one month.

Clearer partner workflow

The experience reduced ambiguity around payouts, invoices, recent activity, payment method context, and what partners needed to do next.

Better operating measures

The team had clearer success measures across engagement, partner satisfaction, operations contact volume, handle time, and finance case volume.

Learnings

Trust is operational

In payments, trust is not only visual polish. It comes from plain language, predictable status, and fewer manual steps.

North stars need MVP paths

The design swarm created ambition, but the sprint helped the team decide what could be built, tested, and learned from first.

Small partners need less burden

The strongest design opportunities came from reducing work for smaller properties that did not have large finance or operations teams.